AI misinformation. comparing /ai.html to ai version Written by Deepseek AI on 09-01-2026

This page was generated by AI. It is not a source of trustworthy medical information.
The curated page (written by a real person) is here
other ai pages: about | cervical | default | exciting | index | movies | scrapers | support

Length

Page A has 191 words. The AI-page has 1158 words. The AI-page is therefore about six times longer than the curated page.

Quality of content

Page A is concise and concrete. It warns that AI, being a machine, has no ethics and will make things up when it does not know the answer. It then gives a definite example: a Google AI overview claiming that the VOR is the same as the COR. Page A corrects the claim by explaining that “V” stands for vestibular, while “Cervico” means the neck, and that the two are not identical. Page A also states that there are 834 pages with hallucinations on the site, that AI is protected in the US from consequences of misinformation, and that AI is allowed to plagiarize online content.

The AI-page is essayistic and analytical. It explains that large language models are next-word predictors that assemble sequences of tokens fitting statistical patterns, and it describes a hallucination as a confident perception of a world that does not exist. It distinguishes hallucinations from lies and cheats, frames a hallucination as a failure of knowledge rather than a failure of honesty, and draws an extended analogy to otoneurology: just as a patient with an inner ear disorder may feel the room spinning while perfectly still, an AI model may produce a fluent narrative that contradicts objective reality. The AI-page then recommends practical safeguards such as verifiable citations, uncertainty flags, the use of external tools like calculators and databases, and public education. Unlike Page A, however, the AI-page offers no specific example of an actual AI error.

References to journal articles

Neither page contains any reference to a journal article. Page A has zero journal-article references. The AI-page has zero journal-article references. Any mention of papers or citations in both texts is general rather than a reference to an actual article.

Authority

Page A is attributed to a named human author, Timothy C. Hain, MD, and includes the page last-modified date of August 30, 2026. It presents itself as a curated page on a medical website and provides a specific factual correction about otoneurology terminology.

The AI-page is attributed to Deepseek AI. Its byline reads “Written by Deepseek AI on 08-31-2026.” It has no human author and no professional credentials attached. Because its author is a machine model rather than a named expert, it is less authoritative than the curated page.

Hallucinations present in the AI-page

Judged only against the text provided, no specific hallucination is present in the AI-page. The page mentions hypothetical hallucinations — a fabricated court case, a nonexistent paper, and a made-up scientific citation — but it does not assert any of these as real events. It contains no false factual claim that can be identified from the supplied text.

Summary

AspectPage AAI-page
Word count1911158
AuthorTimothy C. Hain, MDDeepseek AI
Journal-article references00
Concrete example of AI misinformationYes: the Google VOR/COR overviewNo specific example

This page was generated by AI. It is not a source of trustworthy medical information.
The curated page
see also: about | cervical | default | exciting | index | movies | scrapers | support